CRAN_Status_Badge GitHub tag Total Downloads Build Status codecov Project Status: Active - The project has reached a stable, usable state and is being actively developed. MIT License

This R package implements the dynamic panel data modeling framework described by Allison, Williams, and Moral-Benito (2017). This approach allows fitting models with fixed effects that do not assume strict exogeneity of predictors. That means you can simultaneously get the robustness to confounding offered by fixed effects models and account for reciprocal causation between the predictors and the outcome variable. The estimating approach from Allison et al. provides better finite sample performance in terms of both bias and efficiency than other popular methods (e.g., the Arellano-Bond estimator).

These models are fit using structural equation models, using maximum likelihood estimation and offering the missing data handling and flexibility afforded by SEM. This package will reshape your data, specify the model properly, and fit it with lavaan.

If a result doesn’t seem right, it would be a good idea to cross-reference it with xtdpdml for Stata. Go to https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/dynamic/ to learn about xtdpdml and the underlying method. You may also be interested in the article by Paul Allison, Richard Williams, and Enrique Moral-Benito in Socius, accessible here.


dpm will soon be on CRAN. In the meantime, you can get it from Github.



This package assumes your data are in long format, with each row representing a single observation of a single participant. Contrast this with wide format in which each row contains all observations of a single participant. For help on converting data from wide to long format, check out the tutorial that accompanies the panelr package.

First we load the package and the WageData from panelr.

data("WageData", package = "panelr")

This next line of code converts the data to class panel_data, which is a class specific to the panelr that helps to simplify the treatment of the long-form panel data. You don’t have to do this, but it saves you from providing id and wave arguments to the model fitting function each time you use it.

wages <- panel_data(WageData, id = id, wave = t)

Basic formula syntax

The formula syntax used in this package is meant to be as similar to a typical regression model as possible.

The most basic model can be specified like any other: y ~ x, where y is the dependent variable and x is a time-varying predictor. If you would like to include time-invariant predictors, you will make the formula consist of two parts, separated with a bar (|) like so: y ~ x | z where z is a time invariant predictor, like ethnicity.

One of the innovations of the method, however, is the notion of pre-determined, or sequentially exogenous, predictors. To specify a model with a pre-determined variable, put the variable within a pre function, y ~ pre(x1) + x2 | z. This tells the function that x1 is pre-determined while x2 is strictly exogenous by assumption. You could have multiple pre-determined predictors as well (e.g., y ~ pre(x1) + pre(x2) | z).

You may also fit models with lagged predictors. Simply apply the lag function to the lagged predictors in the formula: y ~ pre(lag(x1)) + lag(x2) | z. To specify more than 1 lag, just provide it as an argument. For instance, y ~ pre(lag(x1, 2)) + lag(x2) | z will use 2 lags of the x1 variable.

Socius article example

This will replicate the analysis of the wages data in the Socius article that describes these models.

Note that to get matching standard errors, set information = "observed" to override lavaan’s default, information = "expected".

fit <- dpm(wks ~ pre(lag(union)) + lag(lwage) | ed, data = wages,
           error.inv = TRUE, information = "observed")
Dependent variable: wks 
Total observations: 595 
Complete observations: 595 
Time periods: 2 - 7 

𝛘²(76) = 138.476
RMSEA = 0.037, 90% CI [0.027, 0.047]
p(RMSEA < .05) = 0.986
SRMR = 0.025 

|                   |   Est. |  S.E. | z val. |     p |
| union (t - 1)     | -1.206 | 0.522 | -2.309 | 0.021 |
| lwage (t - 1)     |  0.588 | 0.488 |  1.204 | 0.229 |
| ed                | -0.107 | 0.056 | -1.893 | 0.058 |
| wks (t - 1)       |  0.188 | 0.020 |  9.586 | 0.000 |

Model converged after 600 iterations

Any arguments supplied other than those that are documented within the dpm function are passed on to sem from the lavaan package.

Model specification options

The following arguments allow you to make changes to the default model specification:

Summary options

You have most of the options available to you via lavaan’s summary method.

You can choose to omit any of: the z statistics (zstat = FALSE), the standard errors (se = FALSE), or the p values (pvalue = FALSE). You may also add confidence intervals (ci = TRUE) at any specified level (ci.level = .95). If you used bootstrapping for uncertainty intervals, you can also specify the method (boot.ci.type = "perc").

The number of digits to print can be set via digits or with the option dpm-digits. You may also standardize coefficients via lavaan’s method using standardize = TRUE.

Other features

Lavaan syntax only

If you just want the lavaan model specification and don’t want this package to fit the model for you, you can set print.only = TRUE. To reduce the amount of output, I’m condensing wages to 4 waves here.

dpm(wks ~ pre(lag(union)) + lag(lwage) | ed, data = wages[wages$t < 5,],
    print.only = TRUE)
## Main regressions

wks_2 ~ en1 * union_1 + ex1 * lwage_1 + c1 * ed + p1 * wks_1
wks_3 ~ en1 * union_2 + ex1 * lwage_2 + c1 * ed + p1 * wks_2
wks_4 ~ en1 * union_3 + ex1 * lwage_3 + c1 * ed + p1 * wks_3

## Alpha latent variable (random intercept)

alpha =~ 1 * wks_2 + 1 * wks_3 + 1 * wks_4

## Alpha free to covary with observed variables (fixed effects)

alpha ~~  union_1 +  union_2 +  union_3 +  lwage_1 +  lwage_2 +  lwage_3 +  wks_1

## Correlating DV errors with future values of predetermined predictors

wks_2 ~~ union_3

## Predetermined predictors covariances

union_1 ~~ ed + lwage_1 + lwage_2 + lwage_3 + wks_1
union_2 ~~ ed + lwage_1 + lwage_2 + lwage_3 + union_1 + wks_1
union_3 ~~ ed + lwage_1 + lwage_2 + lwage_3 + union_1 + union_2 + wks_1

## Exogenous (time varying and invariant) predictors covariances

lwage_1 ~~ ed + wks_1
lwage_2 ~~ ed + lwage_1 + wks_1
lwage_3 ~~ ed + lwage_1 + lwage_2 + wks_1

ed ~~ wks_1

## DV error variance free to vary across waves

wks_2 ~~ wks_2
wks_3 ~~ wks_3
wks_4 ~~ wks_4

## Let DV variance vary across waves

wks_2 ~ 1
wks_3 ~ 1
wks_4 ~ 1

Extract components

Alternately, you can extract the lavaan model syntax and wide-formatted data from the fitted model object to do your own fitting and tweaking.


The model is a special type of lavaan object. This means most methods implemented for lavaan objects will work on these. You can also convert the fitted model into a typical lavaan object:

as(fit, "lavaan")

Get full lavaan summary

While you could convert the model to lavaan model and apply any of lavaan’s functions to it (and you should!), as a convenience you can use lav_summary() to get lavaan’s summary of the model.

Missing data

Take advantage of lavaan’s missing data handling by using the missing = "fiml" argument as well as any other arguments accepted by lavaan::sem().

Feature comparison and roadmap

Feature parity with xtdpdml (Stata) is a goal. Here’s how we are doing in terms of matching relevant xtdpdml options:

Many and perhaps more SEM fitting options are implemented by virtue of accepting any lavaan::sem() argument.



Allison, P. (2022, October 24). Getting the lags right – a new solution. Statistical Horizons. https://statisticalhorizons.com/getting-the-lags-right-a-new-solution/

Allison, P. D., Williams, R., & Moral-Benito, E. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius, 3, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117710578

Leszczensky, L., & Wolbring, T. (2022). How to deal with reverse causality using panel data? Recommendations for researchers based on a simulation study. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882473

Moral-Benito, E., Allison, P., & Williams, R. (2019). Dynamic panel data modelling using maximum likelihood: An alternative to Arellano-Bond. Applied Economics, 51, 2221–2232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1540854

Williams, R., Allison, P. D., & Moral-Benito, E. (2018). Linear dynamic panel-data estimation using maximum likelihood and structural equation modeling. The Stata Journal, 18, 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801800201